As-tu des sources fiables pour défendre cette idée ?
Il faut cesser de rejeter la faute sur des pseudo "fils d’Al-Qaïda, venus pour se venger d'un capitalisme grandissant en tuant des milliers d'innocents". En l'occurrence, ça n'a aucun rapport ici.
Et j'aimerai mettre un poing d'honneur sur le fait que "la plupart des islamistes soient des terroristes" ; ces amalgames ne devraient plus avoir lieu.
Ce qui n'est pas dit, c'est que les "rebelles" en Syrie, sont en réalité des "islamistes"...
Ensuite concernant ce "massacre" il y a quelque chose de pas clair, concernant les auteurs de la tuerie.
Selon la version officielle, ce sont des obus des chars de l'armée syrienne, il faudra m'expliquer comment des obus tuent à l'arme blanche des enfants ?...
«While the investigation into the Houla massacre is ongoing, former British intelligence officer Alastair Crooke told RT these attacks are not characteristic of the cultural region to which Syria belongs. “This type of killing, beheadings, slitting of throats (of children too), and of this mutilation of bodies, has been a characteristic not of Levantine Islam, not of Syria, not of Lebanon, but what happened in the Anbar province of Iraq. And so it seems to point very much in the direction of groups that have been associated with the war in Iraq against the United States who have perhaps returned to Syria, or perhaps Iraqis who have come up from Anbar to take part in it,” he says.
»Crooke believes the Al-Qaeda connection is misleading, as the massacre has its tactical and ideological roots in the Iraq war. “I think the attack is more close to Musab al-Zarqawi , than Al-Qaeda as we know it, in the sense that Zarqawi and Iraq gave birth to this very strong, bigoted, anti-Shia, anti-Iranian rhetoric. Much of that came into Syria when fighters from Anbar returned to their homes around Homs and Hama.” “So yes, we’re talking about Al-Qaeda like groups that are at the very end of the spectrum of the opposition. They may be a minority in terms of the numbers of the overall opposition, but they are defining the war,” Crooke maintains.»
